The Pandemic Theatre of Violence

TARGET BEING LOOTED IN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA (28 May 2020). Video Source: Bitchute.

Today, see looting in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA in the wake of the death of 46-year-old African American George Floyd at the hands of a white policeman, Derek Chauvin. I blogged about his death in my previous post, in which I noted similarities to police violence in China.

THE NATIONAL GUARD HAVE ARRIVED IN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA. THEY ARE GUARDING THE POLICE STATION. (28 May 2020). Video Source: Bitchute.

NATIONAL GUARD AND POLICE AT THE POLICE STATION IN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA (28 May 2020). Video Source: Bitchute.

NATIONAL GUARD AND POLICE AT THE POLICE STATION (28 May 2020). Video Source: Bitchute.

TARGET BEING LOOTED IN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA (28 May 2020). Video Source: Bitchute.

Second video: TARGET BEING LOOTED IN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA (28 May 2020). Video Source: Bitchute.

SECOND DAY OF RIOTING IN MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA (28 May 2020). Video Source: Bitchute.

My main question about this terrible crime was the larger context of these incidents. What made me wonder about it first was the second officer, Tou Thao, who was smirking and laughing at passersby who were begging Chauvin to stop torturing Floyd. Aside from the possibility that he is a psychopath, why was Thao giggling at the distress of both Floyd and of the onlookers?

How about finding this two killers here? #touthao #derekchauvin pic.twitter.com/3LstEbZwMP

— Dj Frosty Ice (@djfrostyice) May 26, 2020

Why would police allow themselves to be filmed murdering a citizen? Even corrupt, racist police presumably prefer to commit felonies off camera. Regarding this crazy, disturbing scene, I could not help wondering if they were put up to it to terrorize the population and/or to provoke racial conflict. I am not questioning the horror of Floyd's death, nor endemic racism in the United States, nor serious problems with police brutality aimed at African Americans.

#DerekChauvin
When I look at his face, I see a racist coward pig who hides behind his badge and gun. He deserves the worst punishment. pic.twitter.com/FhF25huDVl

— Türük (@turuk1336) May 26, 2020

Tou Thao just stood there and watched his white partner murder a black man. He also needs to go straight to jail. It’s no wonder black Americans dont fuck with the blanket term POC when Asians consistently show anti-black racism to defer to the white man. #DerekChauvin. https://t.co/9P0YvJ3wab

— 1 (@0oeyg0oey) May 26, 2020

However, it is obvious that the pandemic is a dry tinderbox and now we have racial war added to the messy debates over the pandemic, COVID deaths, quarantines, restrictions, lockdowns, and economic collapse. You can see the rage on Twitter churning now against Chauvin, where his name has become a hashtag for violent discussion. From the beginning, it seemed that the WHO's priority was inserting a politicized, racial narrative into a public health crisis, an intention which is now fulfilled. Indeed, the mainstream press have been talking about racism and the coronavirus non-stop from the beginning of the pandemic.

The WHO badly managed the pandemic on those grounds, that is, it did not advise stopping travel from China because that would be Sinophobic. There was a campaign in Italy to hug a Chinese man on the street in Florence to combat Sinophobia. After that, the WHO designated the crisis officially as a pandemic and called for global suppression of civil rights, the need to invade people's homes, to incarcerate citizens, to remove children from parental custody. Now, hugging everyone is practically outlawed everywhere. What is going on here?

The Pandemic, One of Many Disruptive Technologies?

Imperial College London's Table of Disruptive Technologies. Click to enlarge. Examine it here. Image Source: Imperial College London.

I have located a related video (below) from Celeste Solum about pandemic global plans at the World Economic Forum (WEF). I blogged about it in my previous two posts, The Birth of the Totalitarian Technocracy: Would You Like to Know More? and The Highest Point of Beta Male Ambition in Human History.

Artificial Intelligence and the Soon Coming Mark of the Beast! (22 April 2020). Video Source: Subsplash.

Solum, a former FEMA manager-turned-whistle-blower is also a militant Christian with a dash of New Age awakening. The opening music and religious rhetoric used by Lyn Leahz and Celeste Solum may not to be the taste of some readers, nor will their ideas. They are as far from a mainstream view of current events as it is possible to get.

However, the substance of what Solum is reviewing is drawn from mainstream Websites, including the WEF and Imperial College London. Thus, it might be worth considering this information. The video I originally shared which was censored was not the above interview; the censored video showed Solum exploring the WEF Website. You can see her commentaries dismissed as a hoax, here.

Coronavirus Fragments 16: The Highest Point of Beta Male Ambition in Human History

Image Source: The Verge.

On 23-24 May 2020, Celeste Solum's video, featured at the top of my 23 May 2020 post, The Birth of the Totalitarian Technocracy, which criticized the World Economic Forum's plans as a roadmap for totalitarian global governance, was taken off Youtube. The account which hosted it, Willem Felderhof, removed all content.

Assuming that the owner of the Willem Felderhof channel did not have a change of heart overnight for other reasons, this could be interpreted through a blue-pilled view, which trusts authority, or through a red-pilled lens, which does not. Was this a question of censoring harmful, crackpot disinformation? Or was this information suppressed because Solum's anti-establishment heresy was correct?

In alt media circles, there is a consensus that one is only shot down if one is over the target, that is, one's interpretation of establishment misdeeds was correct and therefore had to be silenced. Of course, the mainstream perspective is the opposite - that a particular interpretation of information is beyond the pale of reasonable discourse and must be suppressed.

Tesla owners are grappling with the fact that their cars may carry new connotations after Elon Musk tweeted about taking “the red pill,” a reference to “The Matrix” that has been co-opted by the right and discussed in misogynistic and racist forumshttps://t.co/c8bqmUqpBN

— The New York Times (@nytimes) May 19, 2020

On 19 May 2020, the NYT interpreted this distinction as a question of the dangers of being red-pilled, which it defined in terms of a gulf between left- or right-wing political opinions. But red-pilling is not about conservative politics, so much as it is about crashing out of the whole left-right paradigm. Being red-pilled reflects profound disillusionment about establishment narratives, a shattering of world views, and a refusal to accept top-down interpretations of information. The red-pilled experience of extreme alienation, born out of democratized access to information, countered by the control and manipulation of information, describes the new context of 21st century politics.

On this blog, I have maintained that social alienation and economic decline have been compounded by a misunderstanding of the degree to which things have changed over the past two decades. Outdated terms from previous centuries dominate our political, economic, and social discourses. They have not kept pace with enormous leaps in technology. Within that gap, there lie cognitive dissonance, and the potential for totalitarian exploitation as the public cannot distinguish between propaganda, that is, historical terms used to describe reality, and evident, Protean reality.