Image Source: 4chan.
This post reviews recent information from governments and the Internet Underground to understand what the nCov virus is and how different governments are responding to it. It may become clear why some leaders are taking controversial actions. I am considering the following factors:
- Is nCov lab-made?
- Two strains of the nCov virus
- China's claim that they have no new cases
- UK's policy of herd immunity and Switzerland's do little policy
- The possibility that nCov is a biowarfare prelude to World War III
NCov: A Chinese Boxes Problem
Chinese boxes apply to linguistic explanations of reality as well as boots-on-the-ground problem-solving. Image Source: Research Gate.
If we intend to survive, we need to understand nCov without personal prejudices clouding our judgement. Challenge everything you thought was real. NCov is a Chinese boxes problem. Go deeper, go higher, go outside your normal frames of reference.
Image Source: Niagara at Large.
NCov and COVID19 present a Chinese boxes problem. Solve the obvious challenges, and they keep revealing more complicated issues.
My friend thought the nCov virus arose from Chinese people eating bats and snakes and pangolins. But even Nature (doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00548-w) stated on 26 February 2020 that the "mystery deepens" on the source of the virus.
I asked my friend whether he thought the nCov virus came out of a lab. He denied this, since he felt that if it was bioengineered, it would be a controlled pathogen. There would be a cure. It never occurred to him that there might be a cure, but that it is concealed or is not being universally implemented.
I argued that doctors are strongly rewarded by the system, and so they do not understand, until it is too late, just how insane and arcane a political system can be. They might complain about red tape, but as favoured actors in an already corrupt environment, their sight is occluded when they view the true face of power.
Medics are accustomed to structure. They are used to having authority. They are given enough resources and social respect to exist comfortably as individuals. Having been so encouraged, they never imagine that they could be considered expendable. They cannot see how they could be exploited to support operations which are much, much larger than they are. They are not trained to recognize when states are entering into conditions of strategic conflict and how they - like the medics in World War II Nazi Germany and imperial Japan - might be co-opted to serve purposes of genocidal policy-makers. I am not saying that our current policy-makers are genocidal. I am saying that we have historical examples of that fact in the past. It is not outside the scope of possibility.
Under normal conditions, doctors have also almost never - except by personal choice - had to operate in total alienation from the system, or in deinstitutionalized settings. I spoke to my friend about ways to operate successfully in situations which cannot be rationalized or controlled, yet which are not necessarily chaotic. I mentioned the Buddhist concept of the 'pathless path.' It provides a guideline for flying blind. He disliked that, and said that the pathless path sounded like a problem that needed more big data. He prefers a quantified reality.
Fog of War - Lesson 11 You can't change human nature (11 September 2011). Video Source: Youtube.
To challenge the quantified reality, I asked him to consider the pangs of conscience experienced late in life by one of the best-known policy-makers in the world. I referred my friend to the words of the former US Foreign Secretary Robert McNamara (1916-2009), who visited Oxford when we were there.
The fog of War - Lesson 5 HQ (日本語字幕) (26 July 2009). Video Source: Youtube.
McNamara, in his old age, struggled with the problem of the 'fog of war,' and insisted that we must devise rational guidelines in out-of-control situations and conflicts. He implored the students at Oxford to develop these guidelines. He was haunted by the fact that "reason has limits." Even with artificial intelligence and big data, we are mewling infants when we observe the mysteries and majesty of nature, including human nature. McNamara understood this, based on his experiences during the Vietnam War. A true advocate of mid-20th century quantification, standardized testing, and positivist thinking, McNamara concluded that extreme politics defies quantification, yet that form of politics must have rules of war. He yearned for larger architectures that made sense.
On 20 March 2020, an anon wrote to me about the rules of war:
"Coincidental that the pandemic is happening after reading the comment, 'The Geneva convention has been scrapped and biowarfare is on the menu.'"I wasn't aware that the Geneva Convention has been scrapped, but governments have certainly been ignoring it. We can therefore ask if this pandemic is a function of Great Power politics.
Two Strains
Governments and the MSM initially suppressed chatter about the nCov virus. They dismissed any questions as to whether the virus was a bioweapon or lab-made. As a result, that possibility was removed from meaningful discussion. But if the virus was lab-made, that censorship was tremendously destructive. It created a blind spot, and prevented us from grappling with the potential big picture.
Was nCov lab-made? The first 17 November 2019 case did not originate in the wet market of Wuhan. However, my friend was also right: if this virus was lab-made, you would expect there to be a vaccine or cure already developed. And perhaps there is.
Click to enlarge. Image Source: 4chan.
Revisit my Pandemic Chats post (see above) from 20 March 2020. On 17 March 2020, a supposed Chinese leaker spoke on 4chan of two strains of nCov: the lethal L strain and the safe S strain. He or she said that the virus was lab-made and the lethal L strain is incurable. Nothing from conventional medicine will stop it.
Links to reports on China's biolab and bioweapons activities - with possible connections to nCov are here, here, here, here and here. Of course, other countries are engaged in this research as well.
Click to enlarge. An AMA from Bill Gates on Reddit combined vaccination with digital ID certificates: microchipping, underskin tattoos, and the destruction of civil rights. Image Source: 4chan.
Hope in vaccines, as advocated by Bill Gates (above), may then probably be misplaced. NCov may use antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), which means the virus uses antibodies to colonize the body further. The research on this comes from the journal, Microbes and Infection on 13 and 22 February 2020 (doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.02.006). This is not conclusive. You can see further research and discussion on antibody therapy in the Journal of Clinical Investigation from 13 March 2020 (https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI138003).
If nCov uses ADE, then once you have COVID19, it stays with you forever and it uses your own immune system against you. Thus, a vaccine would worsen COVID19, not heal it. This occurred with the original 2002 SARS virus (SARS-CoV), in which vaccinated mice died. That research was published in PLoS One on 12 April 2012 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035421).
That means that vaccination talk relates to some other social engineering and control project, like ID2020. ID2020 states that its goal is to "close the identity gap," that is, identify and track the 1.1 billion people who will either enjoy special new freedoms, or are dissidents who need to be isolated: "Digital identity is being defined now - and we need to get it right." You can read about their approach to developing 'Good Digital ID' here. This message insinuates that anyone not vaccinated will lose right of movement and access to economic activity. This controversy has been hotly discussed over the past week in the Internet Underground.
In that case, we would turn to antivirals. But on 5 February 2020, Thailand Medical News reported that the virus - within an incredibly short amount of time - has developed resistance to antivirals that initially worked:
Next, we turn to chloroquine, the established malaria drug. The only problem with that is its vast array of negative side effects, including blindness. Also, since November 2019, there has been a worldwide shortage of the drug. You can see chloroquine discussed here, here, here, and here. Research on it: here, here, here."in the initial stages of the breakout, doctors at Wuhan General Hospital, after testing with numerous HIV antivirals and even influenza antivirals and combinations, developed their own treatment protocol by using a combo of antivirals such as opinavir and ritonavir along with nebulized alpha-interferon and it worked on most of the patients, as progress and recovery could be seen. However off late, the same treatment protocol does not seem to work anymore and many patients are displaying signs that resistance has been developed, with some regressing into a worse state, indicating that the coronavirus has started to developing an antiviral resistance to these drugs."
The British Response: Herd Immunity
Well this #HerdImmunity strategy is not going to be forgotten. You cannot think that the public will not want to protect their mum/dad/granny etc. https://t.co/ene6eMIOZL— Nangle (@nangle_it) March 22, 2020
Of course, if there is no hope for vaccination, given that the virus uses ADE and exploits our own antibodies to further colonize the body, then the UK policy of herd immunity is also a bizarre fiction. British citizens were so upset by this policy that the hashtags #boristhebutcher and #herd immunity have been circulating on Twitter for days. The official policy has been altered somewhat, to focus on containment. But the real question was: what was Prime Minister Boris Johnson advocating? To critics, it looks like eugenics or genocide of his own people, especially if herd immunity is actually impossible.
unbelievable plan in Uk (21 March 2020). Video Source: Youtube.
Most countries have responded with lockdowns and controlled movement. On 15 March 2020, Singapore's Minister for National Development Lawrence Wong claimed that like the UK, Switzerland was taking lax measures. Why?
China's Numbers are Zero?
China's government has been claiming that they have no, or almost no, new cases. Critics here assume that the Chinese Communist Party is lying about the numbers. Dr. John Campbell, a respected British Youtuber who has been covering the pandemic, has received a lot of flak for believing the Chinese statistics. But what if the numbers are more or less true? Was it really due just to a successful containment policy?
The 17 March 2020 purported Chinese leaker on 4chan claimed that the only way to combat the lethal strain of nCov was to infect people with the safe S strain of the virus. The S strain is less infectious and the Chinese had to deliberately infect their population with it in order to gain general immunity.
This may of course all be lies or disinformation. New research on the two strains comes from the National Science Review on 3 March 2020 (https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa036):
Public discussion about the two strains is only starting. The supposed Chinese leaker implied that this was how the Chinese actually stopped the spread of COVID19. It was not due to containment alone. It took a combination of containment in Wuhan (and possibly elsewhere in China), plus the intentional spread of an 'antidote' in the form of a neutralizing strain of nCov."Although the L type (∼70%) is more prevalent than the S type (∼30%), the S type was found to be the ancestral version. Whereas the L type was more prevalent in the early stages of the outbreak in Wuhan, the frequency of the L type decreased after early January 2020. Human intervention may have placed more severe selective pressure on the L type, which might be more aggressive and spread more quickly. On the other hand, the S type, which is evolutionarily older and less aggressive, might have increased in relative frequency due to relatively weaker selective pressure. These findings strongly support an urgent need for further immediate, comprehensive studies that combine genomic data, epidemiological data, and chart records of the clinical symptoms of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)."
That means that the UK and Swiss governments may be attempting to do something similar, by spreading the S strain among their populations. This is obviously purely unproven speculation, based on dodgy Internet rumours. It would be even more ironic that the truth would be told on a platform where no one respectable would accept or believe the information. Yet if true, it makes the UK approach, in particular, make more sense.
A Prelude to World War III?
In the current diplomatic environment, it is politically incorrect to claim that biowarfare exists or that World War III could be on the table now.
However, imagine a world in which the entire globe is dying from the lethal L strain of nCov, with no possible medical treatment, while the Chinese population has been rendered immune through the S strain. It starts to become clear how World War III could be possible. I am not saying that that is what has happened or is occurring. This is a hypothesis.
Under these circumstances, non-Chinese media and scientific commentators who know this might even be asked to play down the danger of infection and dismiss the distinction between the strains. Meanwhile, the S strain might be deliberately spread in the background to protect populations. We might even see some medical professionals stating the truth in muted tones to colleagues. It is difficult to say, but if true, this rumour would mean that strategically, disinformation and deliberate confusion - and even infection! - of the public would be part of national survival.
ADDENDUM (27 March 2020):
Image Source: 4chan.
Disclaimer for all 'Pandemic Chats' Posts
Warnings against Reading Weaponized Disinformation
My posting of this information does not constitute my belief in this information, nor my desire to spread fear. This 'Pandemic Chats' series is published here to make people aware of the scope of discussion. I do not know whether this is a milestone in the history of real bioweapons in public health or a milestone in the evolution of weaponized online propaganda. Or both.
There are good reasons why you should read this information with extreme caution and discernment. It is possible that the virus is a bioweapon or it may have arisen naturally. Either way, the Chinese government may perceive this outbreak as a bio-weaponized attack.
As such, the coronavirus epidemic might invite Chinese revenge. That retribution may come first in the form of a wave of Internet disinformation warfare, intended to spread panic and violence.
Read this information at your own risk. Treat it as a toxic waste neo-cultural cyber-event. Examine it with the sober reserve of an anthropologist. Coronavirus rumours may be an extreme new type of online propaganda. Do not presume the information is true.
But also understand that if these are real leakers and they are telling the truth to the Internet Underground to relieve their consciences, then the world is now a different place.
I cannot assess the veracity, sources or accuracy of this (dis)information. Some of these fragments and citations refer to legitimate medical publications, which you can read, if you have time. If the rumours are true, you don't have time.
Click to enlarge any posted images. Read them with great care and pray that this is only the next level of dark social media, and not a milestone in biological history of our species.
See all my posts on Epidemics here and here.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment